LEARN HOW NSA IMPLANTS THOUGHTS AND DREAMS AND INFLUENCES BODILY PROCESSES
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88297891/NSA-s-Subliminal-Posthypnotic-Scripts
http://psychrights.org/index.htm
http://www.operationmorningstar.org/british_psychiatry.htm
http://www.questia.com/library/book/psychiatric-terror-how-soviet-psychiatry-is-used-to-suppress-dissent-by-sidney-bloch-peter-reddaway.jsp
http://www.psychassault.org/
http://harassmentterror.wordpress.com/
Gang Stalking and Induced Psychosis
http://www.psychforums.com/schizophrenia/topic76482.html
Thought we had got past superstitious mambo, for those still rooted in Medievalism here follows
http://books.google.gr/books?id=JOyNDbsXUy4C&pg=PA216&lpg=PA216&dq=philosophy+of+suspicion&source=bl&ots=g7XuPSTC-Q&sig=OBF2un2qOZo967i41TaleRu4Au4&hl=el&ei=7QUeTdGSJIG08QON_YS5BQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDQQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=philosophy%20of%20suspicion&f=false
http://www.essortment.com/all/sigmundfreudci_rmew.htm
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/ownwords/civ1.html
http://philpapers.org/rec/BERTEO-5
http://records.viu.ca/~johnstoi/nietzsche/genealogy1.htm
For theater lovers there are always sedimented metanarratives for sale
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_Comedy
Finally, little red hood exists, here’s proof
there’s nothing dangerous about belief in the little red hood
Social Compass Paper Final
social construction of danger involuntary hospitalization
http://www.essortment.com/all/sigmundfreudci_rmew.htm
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/ownwords/civ1.html
http://philpapers.org/rec/BERTEO-5
http://records.viu.ca/~johnstoi/nietzsche/genealogy1.htm
For theater lovers there are always sedimented metanarratives for sale
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_Comedy
Finally, little red hood exists, here’s proof
there’s nothing dangerous about belief in the little red hood
Social Compass Paper Final
social construction of danger involuntary hospitalization
but there is significant danger in religious fanatics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_fanaticism
Are you there yet?
«In the US 40% of psychiatrists face malpractice suits and a mental health practitioner is jailed every 48 hours» (CCHR)
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/155/3/445
http://www.personal-injury-info.net/psychiatric-malpractice.htm
http://www.springerlink.com/content/uw77015256542117/
The United States Supreme Court recognizes that psychiatry is not science—it is opinion. A recent Supreme Court decision stated that a psychiatrist or psychologist is no more qualified than any other person to give an opinion about someone’s mental condition. Supreme Court Decision in Eric Michael Clark v. Arizona, case #05-5966.
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/155/3/445
http://www.personal-injury-info.net/psychiatric-malpractice.htm
http://www.springerlink.com/content/uw77015256542117/
The United States Supreme Court recognizes that psychiatry is not science—it is opinion. A recent Supreme Court decision stated that a psychiatrist or psychologist is no more qualified than any other person to give an opinion about someone’s mental condition. Supreme Court Decision in Eric Michael Clark v. Arizona, case #05-5966.
Who said MK Ultra experiments are over?
Should mamboiatrists be taught the fundamentals of participant observation?
http://books.google.gr/books?id=p1wcO3UNXQ4C&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=participant+observation&source=bl&ots=YTSVglcFOy&sig=GeL6v9uEWFOYP-sh3WxkPuCRQp4&hl=el&ei=Gdn1TMq-E8LBswbG3fTJBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CDgQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participant_observation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participant_observation
Psychiatrists expose the fraud of Psychiatry
Dr. Niall McLaren, an Australian practicing psychiatrist for 22
years, explains what is wrong with the psychiatric profession: That it
cannot/will not take criticism, for fear the entire model of biological
psychiatry will unravel.
That there is no science to psychiatric diagnoses, no brain based diseases. And that psychiatry only pushes mental disorders
as biological disease in order to convince people to take psychiatric drugs, causing a host of dangerous side effects.
For more psychiatrists/psychologists and doctors who have spoken out against the fraud of psychiatry’s biological model of mental disorders
(chemical imbalance, etc) click here:
http://www.cchrint.org/psychiatric-d…entific-tests/
Psychiatrists, Physicians & Psychologists That Debunk Psychiatry as a Science
“There are no objective tests in psychiatry-no X-ray, laboratory, or exam finding that says definitively that someone does or does not have a mental disorder.”
— Allen Frances, Former DSM-IV Task Force Chairman
“…modern psychiatry has yet to convincingly prove the genetic/biologic cause of any single mental illness…Patients [have] been diagnosed with ‘chemical imbalances’ despite the fact that no test exists to support such a claim, and…there is no real conception of what a correct chemical balance would look like.”
— Dr. David Kaiser, psychiatrist
“There’s no biological imbalance. When people come to me and they say, ‘I have a biochemical imbalance,’ I say, ‘Show me your lab tests.’ There are no lab tests. So what’s the biochemical imbalance?”
— Dr. Ron Leifer, psychiatrist
“DSM-IV is the fabrication upon which psychiatry seeks acceptance by medicine in general. Insiders know it is more a political than scientific document… DSM-IV has become a bible and a money making bestseller—its major failings notwithstanding.”
— Loren Mosher, M.D., Clinical Professor of Psychiatry
“All psychiatrists have in common that when they are caught on camera or on microphone, they cower and admit that there are no such things as chemical imbalances/diseases, or examinations or tests for them. What they do in practice, lying in every instance, abrogating [revoking] the informed consent right of every patient and poisoning them in the name of ‘treatment’ is nothing short of criminal.”
— Dr Fred Baughman Jr., Pediatric Neurologist
“Psychiatry makes unproven claims that depression, bipolar illness, anxiety, alcoholism and a host of other disorders are in fact primarily biologic and probably genetic in origin…This kind of faith in science and progress is staggering, not to mention naïve and perhaps delusional.”
— Dr. David Kaiser, psychiatrist
“In short, the whole business of creating psychiatric categories of ‘disease,’ formalizing them with consensus, and subsequently ascribing diagnostic codes to them, which in turn leads to their use for insurance billing, is nothing but an extended racket furnishing psychiatry a pseudo-scientific aura. The perpetrators are, of course, feeding at the public trough.”
— Dr. Thomas Dorman, internist and member of the
Royal College of Physicians of the UK
“I believe, until the public and psychiatry itself see that DSM labels are not only useless as medical ‘diagnoses’ but also have the potential to do great harm—particularly when they are used as means to deny individual freedoms, or as weapons by psychiatrists acting as hired guns for the legal system.”
— Dr. Sydney Walker III, psychiatrist
“The way things get into the DSM is not based on blood test or brain scan or physical findings. It’s based on descriptions of behavior. And that’s what the whole psychiatry system is.”
— Dr. Colin Ross, psychiatrist
“No biochemical, neurological, or genetic markers have been found for Attention Deficit Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Depression, Schizophrenia, anxiety, compulsive alcohol and drug abuse, overeating, gambling or any other so-called mental illness, disease, or disorder.”
— Bruce Levine, Ph.D., psychologist and
author of Commonsense Rebellion
“Unlike medical diagnoses that convey a probable cause, appropriate treatment and likely prognosis, the disorders listed in DSM-IV [and ICD-10] are terms arrived at through peer consensus.”
— Tana Dineen Ph.D., Canadian psychologist
That there is no science to psychiatric diagnoses, no brain based diseases. And that psychiatry only pushes mental disorders
as biological disease in order to convince people to take psychiatric drugs, causing a host of dangerous side effects.
For more psychiatrists/psychologists and doctors who have spoken out against the fraud of psychiatry’s biological model of mental disorders
(chemical imbalance, etc) click here:
http://www.cchrint.org/psychiatric-d…entific-tests/
Psychiatrists, Physicians & Psychologists That Debunk Psychiatry as a Science
“There are no objective tests in psychiatry-no X-ray, laboratory, or exam finding that says definitively that someone does or does not have a mental disorder.”
— Allen Frances, Former DSM-IV Task Force Chairman
“…modern psychiatry has yet to convincingly prove the genetic/biologic cause of any single mental illness…Patients [have] been diagnosed with ‘chemical imbalances’ despite the fact that no test exists to support such a claim, and…there is no real conception of what a correct chemical balance would look like.”
— Dr. David Kaiser, psychiatrist
“There’s no biological imbalance. When people come to me and they say, ‘I have a biochemical imbalance,’ I say, ‘Show me your lab tests.’ There are no lab tests. So what’s the biochemical imbalance?”
— Dr. Ron Leifer, psychiatrist
“DSM-IV is the fabrication upon which psychiatry seeks acceptance by medicine in general. Insiders know it is more a political than scientific document… DSM-IV has become a bible and a money making bestseller—its major failings notwithstanding.”
— Loren Mosher, M.D., Clinical Professor of Psychiatry
“All psychiatrists have in common that when they are caught on camera or on microphone, they cower and admit that there are no such things as chemical imbalances/diseases, or examinations or tests for them. What they do in practice, lying in every instance, abrogating [revoking] the informed consent right of every patient and poisoning them in the name of ‘treatment’ is nothing short of criminal.”
— Dr Fred Baughman Jr., Pediatric Neurologist
“Psychiatry makes unproven claims that depression, bipolar illness, anxiety, alcoholism and a host of other disorders are in fact primarily biologic and probably genetic in origin…This kind of faith in science and progress is staggering, not to mention naïve and perhaps delusional.”
— Dr. David Kaiser, psychiatrist
“In short, the whole business of creating psychiatric categories of ‘disease,’ formalizing them with consensus, and subsequently ascribing diagnostic codes to them, which in turn leads to their use for insurance billing, is nothing but an extended racket furnishing psychiatry a pseudo-scientific aura. The perpetrators are, of course, feeding at the public trough.”
— Dr. Thomas Dorman, internist and member of the
Royal College of Physicians of the UK
“I believe, until the public and psychiatry itself see that DSM labels are not only useless as medical ‘diagnoses’ but also have the potential to do great harm—particularly when they are used as means to deny individual freedoms, or as weapons by psychiatrists acting as hired guns for the legal system.”
— Dr. Sydney Walker III, psychiatrist
“The way things get into the DSM is not based on blood test or brain scan or physical findings. It’s based on descriptions of behavior. And that’s what the whole psychiatry system is.”
— Dr. Colin Ross, psychiatrist
“No biochemical, neurological, or genetic markers have been found for Attention Deficit Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Depression, Schizophrenia, anxiety, compulsive alcohol and drug abuse, overeating, gambling or any other so-called mental illness, disease, or disorder.”
— Bruce Levine, Ph.D., psychologist and
author of Commonsense Rebellion
“Unlike medical diagnoses that convey a probable cause, appropriate treatment and likely prognosis, the disorders listed in DSM-IV [and ICD-10] are terms arrived at through peer consensus.”
— Tana Dineen Ph.D., Canadian psychologist
Parens patriae is covert totalitarianism and a well documented method of dealing with political dissidence
political dissidence psychiatry
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-peter-breggin/medication-madness-how-ps_b_223922.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-peter-breggin/medication-madness-how-ps_b_223922.html
Spitzer speaks out
Columbia University psychiatrist Robert Spitzer, who oversaw two
out of five revisions of the DSM and defined more than a hundred mental
disorders, stated in a new BBC2 documentary: “What happened is that we
made estimates of the prevalence of mental disorders totally
descriptively, without considering that many of these conditions might
be normal reactions which are not really disorders. That’s the problem,
because we were not looking at the context in which those conditions
developed.”
Psychiatric labels, such as “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder” and “Oppositional Defiant Disorder,” have resulted in millions needlessly subjected to dangerous and life-threatening psychiatric drugs. Thirty-three years after Spitzer began working as Chairman of the DSM Taskforce, now backed into a corner by public skepticism of the legitimacy of psychiatric disorders and dozens of international warnings on the dangers of drugs used to treat them, he finally concedes that something may be awry with the diagnostic system he helped to invent. The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), a mental health watchdog, charges that the psychiatrists behind the DSM have misled the public and placed many at risk by convincing them that they are “mentally ill” and in need of harmful psychiatric treatment such as drugs, involuntary commitment, electroshock and restraint.
There is no scientific evidence that any of the millions of people labeled with “mental disorders” have any physical abnormality that justifies the diagnosis, and because of this, psychiatrists cannot agree on who is sick and who is well. Yet, despite this inept psychiatric diagnostic system, worldwide sales of psychotropic drugs prescribed to treat “mental disorders,” including stimulants, antipsychotics and antidepressants, now exceed $80 billion annually.
Psychiatric labels, such as “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder” and “Oppositional Defiant Disorder,” have resulted in millions needlessly subjected to dangerous and life-threatening psychiatric drugs. Thirty-three years after Spitzer began working as Chairman of the DSM Taskforce, now backed into a corner by public skepticism of the legitimacy of psychiatric disorders and dozens of international warnings on the dangers of drugs used to treat them, he finally concedes that something may be awry with the diagnostic system he helped to invent. The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), a mental health watchdog, charges that the psychiatrists behind the DSM have misled the public and placed many at risk by convincing them that they are “mentally ill” and in need of harmful psychiatric treatment such as drugs, involuntary commitment, electroshock and restraint.
There is no scientific evidence that any of the millions of people labeled with “mental disorders” have any physical abnormality that justifies the diagnosis, and because of this, psychiatrists cannot agree on who is sick and who is well. Yet, despite this inept psychiatric diagnostic system, worldwide sales of psychotropic drugs prescribed to treat “mental disorders,” including stimulants, antipsychotics and antidepressants, now exceed $80 billion annually.
No comments:
Post a Comment