5/30/2012

FREAKMASONIC TRASH IN SILVER CARS

There are so many silver flies nowadays driving in silver cars that it's hard to tell who's thickest than the other. Since flies are quite useless and certainly not in a position to make judgments about "allotted time" there is, for once more, only one remedy: KILL THEM, BURY THEM.

How far will UK's freemasonic sick fucks go to protect the centralization of know-how in their morbid inner circle?

Given the abundantly documented freakmasonic complicitous control among the various institutional strata (judiciary, police, civilian snitches, secret services and of course businesses), and the sick symbolic exchange system prevalent in freakmasonic circles that favors symbolic transfers of 'members' all sorts of vices to dissidents of their sick regime, not only sky is the limit. Stay tuned and find out....

JUST ONE CRUCIAL DIFFERENCE: There is no dissidence, as this is not a regime. This a criminal organization of sick bastards and there is ample historical evidence of why this is a criminal association and why freakmasons are sick.

5/25/2012

FREAKMASONIC SICK FUCKS AND THE INFAMOUS HELLFIRE CLUB

http://www.angelfire.com/weird2/obscure2/hell.html

JUST A BUNCH OF BRAINLESS MORONS, POSING AS GUARANTORS OF SOCIAL STABILITY. EXPOSE THEM, KILL THEM, BURY THEM.

TOTALITARIAN REGIMES IN THE MAKING

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4I2NlHNaDc

LEGISLATED LIES


JUST A BUNCH OF LEGISLATED LIES- IT IS EXPLICITLY MENTIONED IN MCKAY'S MASONIC TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS THAT FREAKSMASONS AIM TO MUTUALLY ADVANCE THEIR SORORITY'S INTERESTS. EXPOSE THEM, KILL THEM, BURY THEM.

See also: Grand Lodge Statement 11 March 1998
Meet the webmaster

HOME AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

Third Report

http://www.charlton.demon.co.uk/masonic/report.html

 

FREEMASONRY IN THE POLICE
AND THE JUDICIARY

The following are the conclusions of the Home Affairs Committee inquiry into Freemasonry in the Police and Judiciary. The report was ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 19 March 1997.
The principal issues addressed are,
"(i) whether membership of the freemasons causes any problems in the criminal justice process, and, (ii) whether any restrictions should be placed on membership of the freemasons by police officers, prosecutors, judges or magistrates, or any requirements for them to disclose membership should be established."
The full report is available from The Stationery Office. Ordering details can be found on their web-site.

IS THERE A PROBLEM ARISING FROM
THE NATURE OF FREEMASONRY ITSELF?

32: We have come to the following preliminary conclusions about the nature of freemasonry:
  • The Committee conclude that, when the oaths are read in context, there is nothing in them that would appear sinister, and nothing in the evidence that we have heard that would show a conflict between the oath taken by a judge or policeman and that taken by a freemason.
  • We do not believe that there is anything sinister about freemasonry, properly observed, and are confident that freemasonry itself does not encourage malpractice.

IS THERE EVIDENCE OF A PROBLEM IN PRACTICE?

49: We have come to the following conclusions on what we have been told during this inquiry:
  1. there is a large number of freemasons within the criminal Justice system, but the numbers in themselves give no general cause for concern;
  2. there is some evidence that the numbers may be high in (i) some parts of the judiciary and magistracy, and (ii) some areas of the police (although it seems that in both areas the numbers may be substantially less than in the 1960s and 1970s);
  3. where it is not entirely groundless, most or all of the evidence alleging masonic corruption in the field of policing is largely circumstantial, in the sense that it involves assuming that steps taken by individuals who were freemasons, in respect of others who were also freemasons, were taken because both individuals were freemasons rather than because the individuals knew each other or for some other reason;
  4. it is not possible on the evidence we received to say that there has never been any abuse of masonic contacts and certainly there are many allegations. But some of the extreme criticisms of widespread abuse we received are manifestly unfounded and the others can not be said to have been substantiated to us on the balance of probability let alone beyond reasonable doubt, although in a small number of cases, such as that in Blackburn, this is a reasonable inference;
  5. where there is evidence of criminal or otherwise improper behaviour by freemasons, the freemasons themselves are taking stronger action against the perpetrators than was the case in the past; whether or not this is because of increased public interest, we welcome it; and
  6. there is a widespread public perception that freemasonry can have an unhealthy influence on the criminal justice system, and we certainly believe that one of the main reasons for freemasonry's poor public image is a perception that it is a secret society. We therefore encourage freemasons to address this perception and to correct the negative image of freemasonry.

DISCLOSURE

56: It is obvious that there is a great deal of unjustified paranoia about freemasonry and we have no wish to add to it. We believe that there would be practical difficulties in requiring a register of freemasons in all areas of the Criminal Justice system, but it would certainly be possible to establish one. We also note that the Prime Minister himself has said that he was in favour of a requirement for public officials to declare whether they are freemasons or not, and that the Shadow Home Secretary believes that membership of the freemasons should be a declarable and registrable interest. We believe however that nothing so much undermines public confidence in public institutions as the knowledge that some public servants are members of a secret society one of whose aims is mutual self-advancement - or a column of mutual support, to use the masonic phrase. We note the claim by United Grand Lodge that freemasons are not a secret society but a society with secrets. We believe, however, that this distinction is lost on most non-masons. The solution is not bans or proscriptions or any form of intolerance. We acknowledge that a lot of honest people derive innocent social pleasure from membership of freemasonry and we have no wish to deprive them of such pleasure. The solution is disclosure. We recommend that police officers, magistrates, judges, and crown prosecutors should be required to register membership of any secret society and that the record should be available publicly. However, it is our firm belief that the better solution lies in the hands of freemasonry itself. By openness and disclosure, all suspicion would be removed and we would welcome the taking of such steps by the United Grand Lodge.

Parliamentary Copyright Notice

Source: Home Affairs Committee Third Report: Freemasonry in the Police and Judiciary (HCP 192 1997) Parliamentary copyright 1997. Reproduced by Gordon Charlton under licence from the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office on behalf of Parliament.
  1. Permitted Use. Visitors to this Web Site are granted permission to access this Parliamentary copyright material and to download the Parliamentary copyright material onto electronic, magnetic, optical or similar storage media provided that such activities are for private research, study or in-house use only.
  2. Restricted Use. Visitors to this Web Site must not copy, distribute, sell or publish any of the Parliamentary copyright material taken from this Web Site. Any other use of the material requires the formal permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office on behalf of Parliament.


The View From Freemasons' Hall

The following is a News Release issued by the United Grand Lodge of England on 25th March 1997, in response to the Home Office report.
  1. The inquiry was originally into the police and the judiciary, and Freemasons gladly accept the Committee's conclusions at paragraph 32.
  2. As a lawful and law-abiding society, Freemasons will be disappointed by the hasty conclusion in paragraph 56 of the Home Affairs Committee's report, which is in marked contrast to the observations in the report itself. Page xxii of the report shows how the Committee's original understanding and tolerant view of Freemasonry was changed by an amendment. This draws on three suppositions for which the report provides no basis (and for which there is no basis) to support a recommendation which if implemented would interfere with a fundamental right in British life.
  3. There is no basis for saying in paragraph 56 that Freemasonry is a secret society. It is not one by law and never has been (the Unlawful Societies legislation in the 1700s exempted Freemasonry) . In practice our meeting places are known locally and published in Grand Lodge's Masonic Year Book, which with its rule book Grand Lodge's Book of Constitutions) is on sale to the public; our aims are a matter of public record, and Freemasons are free to disclose their membership.
  4. There is no basis for saying in paragraph 56 that one of Freemasonry's aims is mutual self-advancement. Freemasonry's aims were published in 1938 (and are re-printed in the front of the Book of Constitutions). None of these aims include mutual self-advancement. Grand Lodge's written and oral evidence emphasised that Freemasonry is not to be used to advance interests, and that this is very clearly understood by every Freemason, even from the time before he becomes a member of a Lodge. [A column of mutual defence and support, to use the correct phrase, does not mean mutual self-advancement.]
  5. Paragraph 56 is wrong in saying that Grand Lodge claims that Freemasonry is not a secret society, but a society with secrets. This is a minor point, and only worth mentioning because it shows that the amendment comes from a mind reluctant to admit any evidence not matching its preconceptions. This phrase has been used in the past by Freemasons and commentators to summarise an important difference between Freemasonry and secret societies. In recent years it has been recognised in Freemasons' Hall as too facile, and it is not in current use by central Masonic spokesmen, nor has it formed any part of Grand Lodge's evidence to the Committee.
  6. The Committee abandons its initial and reasonable reluctance to recommend a compulsory form of registration of Freemasons. Before paragraph 56 was amended this was 'because we acknowledge that to do so implies a basis for suspicion' (the Committee would have agreed there was no such basis) 'and would be an unnecessary interference with a person's right to privacy which, like the secrecy of the vote, we struggle to preserve in so many areas of British life'. Instead, and on the uncertain basis of unfounded suppositions (see above), the report recommends that those concerned with the administration of justice should be required to register membership of any secret society, and that the record should be available publicly.
  7. Because Freemasonry is not a secret society, the Committee has been led into accepting a flawed amendment. This is legislation based on perception, not reality, and if it comes into effect will be a sad day for individual freedom.
(signed) MBS Higham
Grand Secretary

See also: Grand Lodge Statement 11 March 1998

U.K. Freemasonry in the News, have the 'Brethren' finally met their Waterloo?
 
http://freemasonrywatch.org/britishmasons.html

LOOK, IT'S THE ROYAL CROOKS AGAIN

MEET THE MASTER CRIMINAL AT THE HEAD OF ALL FREAKMASONS

SPOT THE DIFFERENCES: WHO'S THE PERVERT?
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stop-masons-crimes.html 
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Masonic_Ritual_Murders.htm

5/22/2012

Who said MK Ultra experiments are over?

Declassified MK-Ultra Project Documents:


http://michael-robinett.com/declass/c000.htm

Echelon interception at its best! Schocking mail- just came through anonymously

” Dear blog administrator,
I can hardly find any words to describe this brand new form of cybernetic harassment [YOU MAY WANT TO REFER TO EXISTING LAWSUIT, IT IS CALLED SOCIOCYBERNETIC TERRORISM. THE TECHNOLOGY IS OWNED AND HANDLED BY NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCIES AND THE INTERCEIVED MATERIALS ARE DISSEMINATED TO NWO TRASH, REBORN SOCIOSEMIOTICALLY THROUGH CHILDISH PLEDGES]. While composing my dissertation, the text is regularly intercepted by Echelon and then fed to NSA human automata who reproduce contents through pre-rehearsed playback in random encounters. Please advise me if there is any way to stop human trash from appropriating intellectual property. Strangely enough, this happened every time I was electromagnetically forced to rush to the toilet (yes, NSA’s biological determinism has found fertile soil in my innermost bowel processes). Upon returning to my studyroom I can even see strange wave-like patterns on my screen, which disappear as soon as I re-establish accurate visual contact. Is there anything I can do to shield myself against these legit thieves?”
Dear Reader,
However awkward this may sound, nation-states have given up on the interception issue. The answer on behalf of the perpetrating controllers was to turn what was once an underground black-ops method of industrial espionage and theft of intellectual property into a fashion, by recruiting drugged-out and illubinistic orgy fans from a very young age, who act as ambassadors of this new wannabe regime. Mostly you can ignore them, but if they get really annoying (eg crossing the ‘mindcamping”barrier and starting having tactile effects) you can always adopt alternative methods. I will send you a separate mail on such counter black-ops methods….Also look for cases where there is a conflict of interests (eg a forthcoming book by Foxtrot University Press) in your research area. In this case, Foxtrot University Press thickret services controllers will seek to disorient you. In this case, just work peripherally on your research area, wait until the new book comes out and then tear it to pieces. You may also want to consider a black ops viral campaign yourself, it is quite inexpensive nowadays and highly effective. Remember, this is no game theory, just a matter of conferring as many blows as possible to your opponents, as it is unlikely that it will balance out./

Idio[syn]cratic metric systems- Planet 7 against freakmasonry

Let the battle commence- desperate housewives in charge of Planet 7′s metric system (15 and counting) against funky freakmasonic Utopian Ladder (21-55, 56 and for those among them who can count 57,58, yes, followed by 59 and guess what a Grand Inspector aged 8 also told me that 60 follows suit!). There are even human lizards, all-green funny creatures posing as being at one with a mythopoetic hero called Lucifer at the age of 100 (yes, they walk among us). What a marvellous way of legitimating what is illegal, sanctioned by a hyperreal metric system for those in quest for an identity (I’ll never forget a 28-year old baboon licking on a 34-year old chimpanzee’s luscious behind on his way to intra-company promotion and a 54-old urangutan phantasizing about seer-like omniscience of a man-made system of interlocking relations, who willingly drunk to his death, having gazed at such breath-taking magnanimity- yes, he was part of that “other” camaraderie, 6 not 9, the idiots who chased the Da-Fabulous Code instead of revelling on fat bonuses). The attached should also be expanded to account for conversions, especially relevant for the butt end of the black ops borough

5/03/2012

THE FINGERPRINTS OF... REDISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION

HAARP INDUCED SLEEP, YOUR MOTHER OPENING THE DOOR TO SECRET SERVICES TRASH WHO STEAL YOUR COMPUTER FILES WHILE BEING ASLEEP- A NEW FORM OF REDISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION! VERY...ENGAGING!