1/03/2013
Towards a zoosemiotics of non-recognizability: Crushing the ontotheological face-centric community mirror
forthcoming in Semerotica by Maximo Scalzzone
On remote causes and 'cancer' as a deadly condition for co-belonging with a nihilistic community
As simple as this: An eye for an eye (or two)
Heidegger spoke about freedom in the face of death and about other onto-theological underpinnings of ec-sistence. Just ask your nearest communitarian victim, working in a bakery shop, with chemo-induced baldness, always smiling in 'overflowing' love towards her perps. Death will set you free from your singularity. Totally agree- This is why we call it mass killings.
Heidegger spoke about freedom in the face of death and about other onto-theological underpinnings of ec-sistence. Just ask your nearest communitarian victim, working in a bakery shop, with chemo-induced baldness, always smiling in 'overflowing' love towards her perps. Death will set you free from your singularity. Totally agree- This is why we call it mass killings.
Ever wondered what is the function of "taxation" in a rhetorically constituted ontological community?
Look no further- See Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's
(The New Rhetoric) analysis of the rhetorical concept of 'phoros' (and then to how
'charges' are calculated based on Baudrillard's Symbolic Exchange and
Death). In exactly the same fashion that the 'black'n'silver' New Left
constructed a pragmatico-utopian nouveau ethos.
Five ways in which organized perpetration mechanisms function in the workplace
1. Information is diffused on a need-to-know basis or invitation to become shareholder in a clique’s party
2.
Behavioral mambo functions as gatekeeper for
setting boundaries about what is acceptable and what is not (by a
micro-community that defines boundaries in such a way as to maintain control
over the distribution of money and power)
a.
Aka freemsaonry’s strict formalism (just a
facilitating mechanism; by analogy, behavioral modification mechanisms employed
in agenda 21 micro-social engineering)
3.
Others (who spend more time in orgy-parties-
well, someone has to fill in performance evaluations) are usually credited for
targets’ work
4.
Employee behavior is shaped through community
value-judgments (i.e. implicit agreement among perps about how to slice the
pie)
a.
Evaluations are imbued to targets through
steering mechanisms, such as pre-planned questions-answers ‘in order to reach
the heart of the matter’ (preferably shrouded in the most general terms
possible and/or by selectively framing examples with an intent to validate assumptions)
5.
Adhocism is the key word for all evaluation
judgments (rules always apply selectively)
THIS YEAR WILL BE FULL OF 'ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR' HAIRY-TIPS, SUCH AS THE ABOVE!
12/31/2012
12/14/2012
Interpretive closure for systemic homestasis (forthcoming in Semerotica)
Fascinating results coming up from a longitudinal ethnographic study into zoohabitants' interpretive patterns. Sociocybernetic education in focus: how automata are trained into recognizing and categorizing their 'own' and 'others'.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)